Coreflowhub Institute

Teams program

Web Accessibility Courses for Teams Building Better Interfaces

This page condenses how Coreflowhub Institute sequences audit practice, remediation labs, and mentor reviews for cross-functional groups—not solo heroes.

Audit workflow

Teams bring one production route per sprint. We annotate landmarks, capture keyboard traces, and file issues with evidence bundles that procurement partners can skim without sitting in the full session.

  • Shared taxonomy between QA reviewers and frontend mentors.
  • Timestamped screen reader logs attached to the same ticket ids as automated checks.
  • Explicit “paused” states when third-party embeds block progress.
Desk scene with braille tablet beside printed wireframe sheets

Remediation examples

Snapshots below reference anonymized diffs from Component Remediation Lab cohorts—names scrubbed, file paths generalized.

Flow from audit notes to merged pull request Audit notes Pairing lab Merged PR + doc Each arrow must carry ticket ids + SR log links before mentors sign off.

Testing stack

We standardize on Playwright plus axe for gates, then NVDA and VoiceOver passes for narration. Teams may swap in vendor tools, but the evidence schema stays constant so mentor reviews stay comparable cohort to cohort.

Mentor reviews

Mentors never-only comment in video. They leave inline suggestions on branches, then summarize decisions in a shared log that Policy-Ready Documentation Studio alumni reuse for procurement packets.

Learner questions we expect

Will you rewrite our entire backlog?

No. We prioritize two deep components per team so quality stays high; everything else receives written guidance only.

Can we keep using our design system tokens?

Yes—Keyboard Orbit explicitly maps focus-visible tokens to engineering variables so QA scripts stay stable.

What if procurement rejects our wording?

Bring the redlines. Documentation studio hours coach replacements without resorting to hype or absolute claims.